Monday, November 23, 2009


Dear fellow ponderers on this mortal coil,

Join me for a moment in the world of contemplation and thought, where the material slows to a halt and the mental consumes our focus.

Our class was assigned to consider some ethical complications of neuroprosthetics, a very possible future technology in which we can enhance or recreate cognitive and sensory processes in humans. You could, for instance, have neurosurgery in order to be a math whiz, or to have an incredible memory for every fact or number you encounter, or to be able to perceive sounds from miles away, etc. This brings up a number of moral dilemmas,as you can imagine. The following question was posited by our teacher.

Research Assignment for Biopsychology Class: Question # 4. Would you become “less” human with all of these prosthetics?

Perhaps the knowledge of one with a neuroprosthetic would be valued and yet not admired as much as the naturally acquired abilities of an unmodified human or a savant. While intrinsically speaking the knowledge or ability would be the same in both, its artificiality in the former may to some degree taint its beauty or metphorically cheapen it, similar to a manufactured ruby which is physically and molecularly identical to a natural one, and yet cheaper and less valuable by virtue of its unnatural fabrication.

To know if a person would become less human by means of the use of neuroprosthetics, scientists must first grapple with the complexity of what makes us distinctively human. Since scientists have worked tirelessly to erase any distinction between humans and other mammals, can we then not pointedly ask them how anybody or anything could become less human?

Thoughtfully yours,

Mrs H
tweet us @_mrs_h
Follow us on Facebook!

1 comment:

  1. I agree with you, I like how the you used the ruby example to illustrate your thoughts. On my paper I said if we used prosthetic organs it would be difficult to draw a line of who can and can't have them, like a child with a weak heart or a crazy political leader's aim for immortality at the age of 100. It makes you ask the question of did life intend for me to not have a leg or a close loved one inorder to teach me something valuable about life or is it an opportunity to fight the odds and live a new and previously unthought of life? This, atleast for me, is a difficult question to answer since life isn't always black and white (it's more like that fuzzy color when your tv loses reception).




Related Posts with Thumbnails